Home > Not Working > Applicationinstance Completerequest

Applicationinstance Completerequest


every request to the IIS is initially wrapped in an HttpApplication object, that has a set of events that when fired can be implemented in HttpModules, there you are still in Log everything 3. Would the airline let me board a Schengen-bound flight if my return flight is on a different airline? Terminating a request might break stuff.If u r trying to avoid extra cycles caused by db why not use msmq?

You really shouldn't do that Rick - Response.End...The way to do "custom Ajax" stuff (with e.g. I looked for this Q but I didn't get proper answer . share|improve this answer answered May 15 '12 at 15:35 Tejs 29.7k54172 Thanks for the reply. What is "Cresol Soap"? https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/tmarq/2009/06/25/correct-use-of-system-web-httpresponse-redirect/

Applicationinstance Completerequest

in the eventviewer i get "OK TREVIL", where i want to see nothing at all. The behavior of CompleteRequest changed with 2.0, as Rick describes here. Success! Register Privacy Policy Terms and Rules Help Popular Sections Tech Support Forums Articles Archives Connect With Us Twitter Log-in Register Contact Us Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2016 XenForo Ltd.

How do I make an alien technology feel alien? According to MS http://support.microsoft.com/kb/312629, and seemingly verified by reflection into HttpResponse.End(), the correct way to do this is to call HttpContext.Current.ApplicationInstance.CompleteRequest() http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.web.httpapplication.completerequest.aspx. This gracefully ends execution of the thread with a minumum of server resources. .net Completerequest lets remeber my scenario in order to understand, what i wanted to achieve is to create a handler and in any case of throwing an exception I wanted the code to

We're a friendly computing community, bustling with knowledgeable members to help solve your tech questions. Httpcontext.current.response.redirect Not Working I concurs with the delegate idea. optimally in my case was using both SuppressContent and Response.End() with a double catch for ThreadAbortException. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15675806/response-end-and-completerequest Not the answer you're looking for?

Try our newsletter Sign up for our newsletter and get our top new questions delivered to your inbox (see an example). Httpcontext.current.response.end() Thread Was Being Aborted Just click the sign up button to choose a username and then you can ask your own questions on the forum. This means the HTTP 302 redirect response is sent to the browser at the line where you call CompleteRequest(), which gives you a chance to do operations that don't affect the Can the captain change players' positions without permission from a coach or manager?

Httpcontext.current.response.redirect Not Working

what shines for me is that it just aborting the thread as is, so i tried that, i just replaced my line with Thread.CurrentThread.Abort(). https://forums.asp.net/t/1347761.aspx?HttpApplication+CompleteRequest+doesnt+work When this exception is raised, the runtime executes all the finally blocks before ending the thread. Applicationinstance Completerequest private void EndResponse() { try { Context.Response.End(); } catch (System.Threading.ThreadAbortException err) { System.Threading.Thread.ResetAbort(); } catch (Exception err) { } } © Rick Strahl, West Wind Technologies, 2005 - 2016 Completerequest C# PostBack and Render Solutions?

Looking at the Response.End code with Reflector yields: public void End(){ if (this._context.IsInCancellablePeriod) { InternalSecurityPermissions.ControlThread.Assert(); Thread.CurrentThread.Abort(new HttpApplication.CancelModuleException(false)); } else if (!this._flushing) { this.Flush(); this._ended = true; if (this._context.ApplicationInstance != null) { So I gave it a try but I noticed the codes below it still runs, which I do not want. With this code, the clean up needed is done, but the html that is rendered is being appended to the attachment downloaded. This also explains why Response.Close() doesn't work correctly for subsequent requests: Response.End() resp. Httpresponse Redirect Django

use with utmost caution... –marc_s Aug 21 '14 at 19:43 like an ejector seat. ThreadAbortExceptions are nasty little guys. share|improve this answer edited Jan 7 '13 at 10:45 answered Jan 7 '13 at 9:58 ingredient_15939 1,38041936 add a comment| Not the answer you're looking for? CompleteRequest() says that the handler/page finished the job and the modules dont need to continue their jobs.

Haven't had time to check what the problem on the second and third one is but it appears the handler fires correctly. Context.applicationinstance.completerequest Asp Net I also don't like mucking with special settings like this for a generic scenario.R Douglas June 13, 2008 # re: Ending a Response without Response.End() Exceptions? Mimsy were the Borogoves - why is "mimsy" an adjective?

The problem is that the other events still seem to run.

So, if user typed in URL in address bar this HTTP module will check if user can access that URL or not. see this short article about the why not: http://weblogs.asp.net/hajan/why-not-to-use-httpresponse-close-and-httpresponse-end so MSDN advice is to implemet flags like this http://web.archive.org/web/20101224113858/http://www.c6software.com/codesolutions/dotnet/threadabortexception.aspx, so that YOU control it. Cybertones December 03, 2009 # re: Ending a Response without Response.End() Exceptions? Context Response Redirect Why (and when) does pattern matching with f[__] perform MUCH more quickly than _f?

Of course, it's hard to find any Microsoft documentation on what this method does, so some underlying assumptions could be wrong here. If you want to wait until the aborted thread has ended, you can call the Thread..::.Join method. One simplest way is by using delegate.http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/22t547yb.aspx Rick Strahl May 27, 2008 # re: Ending a Response without Response.End() Exceptions? I tried to gracefully do a Server.Transfer() to another page early in the page life cycle, and quickly realized that it was all but impossible, if I wanted to maintain my

asked 3 years ago viewed 8882 times active 3 years ago Upcoming Events 2016 Community Moderator Election ends in 9 days Linked 174 Is Response.End() considered harmful? you cannot modify anymore the HttpApplication, only access it. Is there any benefit from using SHA-512 over SHA-256? The service cannot be started, either because it is disabled or because it has no enabled deices ass trypsin: 我把windows installer 服务开了之后,还是一样的报错,同样的0x80070422错误...

I'm technical referent but I lost the lead for technical decisions Do any of the following actions show up in a credit report? How? Join is a blocking call that does not return until the thread actually stops executing." Marco May 26, 2008 # re: Ending a Response without Response.End() Exceptions? more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed

It's already out of the mainline and can if desired be completely offloaded to a separate banner server.But that's not really the point. Take a look at the MSDN docs for it under the "Remarks" section:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.threading.threadabortexception.aspx"When a call is made to the Abort method to destroy a thread, the common language runtime throws a everything after a flush that sends the banner code over, since the banner should still be visible & counted even if the rest of the page doesn't finish. (Admittedly this is